Tuesday, 2 April 2013

COUNTY GOVERNORS




I had promised myself that I would not write until the elections were over in their entirety considering the amount of vitriol and tribal hate that had/has pervaded the social media. But now the elections are over and I would like to share my two cents worth on observations, which will revolve around the personalities that contested the presidency, which will came at a later date, but rather, on the devolved centers of authority otherwise known as counties.

But before I delve into the counties, I would like to congratulate both Raila Odinga and Uhuru Kenyatta for the strong and spirited campaigns that had the country riveted for months on end, which I will also write about at a later date as they were both great studies in management and marketing. I would also like to congratulate them individually with the now President-elect Uhuru Kenyatta for emerging victorious against many odds and to PM Raila Odinga for choosing to addressing his grievances with the election through the Supreme Court and for accepting the verdict of the court.

Now to the address the post-election period and what we expect from the incoming governments. The constitution has devolved some responsibilities, duties and functions away from the National Government to the County Governments but left others such as national security, foreign relations, education, agricultural policy, health policy and most of the revenue collection in the hands of the hands of the National Government.

After the County Governments have settled down after their honey moon, they will soon realize that what was devolved to them merely leaves them with duties akin to those of village heads. Why do I reason this? Let’s take a look carefully.

1.       The responsibility of security provision was left entirely with the national government and as we all know too well, most of the problems affecting the counties have their genesis in security, of lack thereof. Most governors have promised to eradicate insecurity and provide jobs to the millions of youths wondering aimlessly and hopelessly in our trading centers. To achieve this in meaningful numbers, they must attract investors in good numbers to set up enterprises that can create these jobs and as we all know, any serious investor rates the security of his enterprise at the top and so the governors have to tackle insecurity as their first priority. Now here is the problem, security is the sole responsibility of the national government through the police service and the provincial authority. Now, we all know that these two bodies are part of the problem in terms of insecurity and couple that with the sense of resentment they surely feel towards this “new guy” who has come to replace them and deprive them of access to the gravy train and you get the idea of the problem the governor has.

2.       All governors have promised to uplift the education standards in their counties. Friends, the only education the governor can improve are where the constitution empowers him to, and these are, drum roll please, nursery schools and village polytechnics. Primary schools and secondary schools don’t fall under his influence but are the responsibility of the cabinet secretary for education for the policy formulation and implementation and the successor to the Teachers Service Commission (TSC). Unless the governors want to establish independent schools like happened in the period before independence, then they will just have to sit twiddling they thumbs as they wait and hope that Senators and MPs will push the national government to focus on education in a much more meaningful way then previous governments have. But considering the propensity of politicians to be concerned with matters that benefit them directly, I wouldn’t burn the mid night oil waiting for them to act on this as their first priority.

3.       Health is where the governors have influence since apart from referral and level 5 hospitals and the national health policy, everything to do with provision of primary health care was devolved. Before you pop the champagne bottle, take a step back and just remember the many battles the outgoing government had been involved in with unions representing healthcare workers and in fact, nurses are still technically on strike. Negotiating with these unions is the responsibility of the Salaries and Remuneration Commission and whatever compromise they arrive at, the county governments have to abide by them and pay them accordingly. Oh, before we are done with health care provision, keep in mind that the bureaucratic, monolithic and inefficient entity called KEMSA which supplies all government hospitals from the dispensary to the referral hospitals with all supplies from drugs, bandages, beds, cabinets to stationery is a parastatal controlled by performing, while it has no competition in supplies to government hospitals, it has been running costly advertisements in print and electronic media while hospitals have been dispensing pain killers for all ailments.

4.       Most counties are dependent on agriculture and the governors during their campaigns fell over each other promising all manner of incentives and subsidies. We have a problem here my friends;
i)                    To provide subsidy basically means cushioning the farmer from high costs of agricultural inputs from seeds to fertilizer. The world prices are currently on an upward trend due to the pace at which the economies and population of China, India, Indonesia and Brazil are growing. What this means is that the county governments will be digging deeper into their coffers to subsidize the price of a product they have no control over.
ii)                   The governors have also promised improved market access to farm produce. This means they will have to construct new and modern markets and improve access roads, which means more money being expended.
iii)                 The governors have promised to kick out middle men from the chain. At first glance this sound good, and for the most part it is. However, this needs to be handled with a lot of care as these middle men are businessmen exploiting a gap that already exists. They offer established processors competition and hence keep farm gate prices high and for some produce, they are the only buyers.

5.       Governors have also in their enthusiasm and sometimes ignorance, been promising to build factories for things such as fish processing, coffee processing, leather tanning, abattoirs, milk processing, maize milling and animal feed production. This all sounds good and noble, but remember the problems we are having with quasi-commercial parastatals. Most of them are struggling and some virtually dead surviving on bailouts from the government. The best way to handle this would be for the county governments in partnership with the national government to provide an enabling environment for private enterprise to establish this. But this will have to be initiated by the governors as the national government will not initiate this as the same officers who have been on the ground will still be the ones there and as we all know, with them calling the shots previously, nothing much has happened.

6.       Road infrastructure is another area where the county governors have a problem. They went around promising to fix all roads from some promising to build miles of new tarmac roads to making all weather roads in all areas. This is all good as the counties cannot grow without communication and connection with the markets for what they will produce. Road construction in Kenya is very costly affair and coupled with all manner of promises that have been given, frustration will creep in when the pace of construction does not match the expectations.

7.       Revenue collection will certainly be the most problematic areas for a good number of governors. The national government has retained most of the sources of collection and apart from the allocation to county governments of at least 15% of the national budget, which when you think about is not much, the county governments are left with cess, market fees, business licenses and entertainment taxes and even then, they cannot just wake up and impose new fees without the input of the Revenue and Allocation Commission. Now good people, these are the same revenue streams that now abolished local authorities had and they had less to do compares to the county governments and most of them could not offer services. This was partly because of non collection of amounts due to them and diversion (a polite alternative to corruption). The governors have therefore no option than to go on aggressive revenue collection by making sure all defaulters, dodgers and evaders are brought into the net. This is the only way but it will not be popular as unfortunately a lot of people do not like paying for their fair share but are always keen to accrue to themselves the most benefits especially when the government is involved.

All of these seem to point to the governor’s job as being an impossible one, but it need not be. We have all been pointing out that the governor’s job is purely managerial, I hold the firm belief that it’s also political because with all the juggling he will have to do, he must have the skills to get the MPs and Senators to do their bidding at the National Assembly and The Senate and to have the County Reps. to play ball and support their programmes. But all said and done, I don’t see a lot of the governors being reelected in 2017.